CURRENT AFFAIRS | 31 MARCH 2026
CLAT GK + SOCIAL JUSTICE & CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
– Article 14 (Equality), Article 15 (Non-discrimination), Article 342 (Scheduled Tribes)
– Criminal Tribes Act 1871 and its colonial legacy
– Renke Commission and Idate Commission recommendations
– Census enumeration and constitutional schedules
– Article 338 (National Commission for SCs)
Who Are Denotified and Nomadic Tribes (DNTs)?
Denotified Tribes (DNTs) are communities that were labelled as “criminal by birth” under the colonial Criminal Tribes Act, 1871. The British administration branded entire communities — including nomadic traders, performers, pastoralists, and forest-dwellers — as hereditary criminals, subjecting them to surveillance, restrictions on movement, and forced settlement.
After Independence, the Act was repealed in 1952 and replaced by the Habitual Offenders Act. However, the social stigma persists. These communities were officially “denotified” — meaning they were removed from the criminal list — but decades of marginalization have left them among India’s most invisible populations.
The Numbers: Scale of Invisibility
| Metric | Data |
| Estimated DNT population | 10.74 crore (Renke Commission) |
| DNT communities identified | ~1,200 (Idate Commission) |
| Unclassified communities | 268 (not in any SC/ST/OBC list) |
| Census 2027 coverage | 36 states/UTs, 784 districts |
| Criminal Tribes Act | 1871 (enacted) → 1952 (repealed) |
| SEED scheme allocation | Rs 200 crore (only Rs 69.3 crore utilised) |
| Separate Census column | Demanded but NOT confirmed |
The Census 2027 Debate
India’s Census 2027 will include caste enumeration for the first time since 1931. The Office of the Registrar General of India (RGI) has agreed in principle to enumerate DNTs, but the critical question remains: will DNTs get a separate column or will they continue to be counted within SC, ST, and OBC categories?
- Current problem — DNTs are scattered across SC, ST, OBC, and unreserved categories depending on the state. This fragmentation makes it impossible to design targeted welfare policies
- Demand — The National Alliance of DNT and NT demands a separate constitutional schedule (similar to SC/ST schedules) and a dedicated Census column
- Government position — The Ministry of Social Justice has recommended inclusion to the RGI, but there is no official confirmation of a separate classification
Constitutional Framework: The Classification Gap
– Article 14 — Equality before law; DNTs face systemic discrimination despite formal denotification
– Article 15 — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth
– Article 342 — Scheduled Tribes; President may specify tribes by notification, Parliament may modify the list. BUT there is no equivalent article for DNTs
– Article 338 — National Commission for Scheduled Castes (monitors safeguards for SCs)
– Article 338A — National Commission for Scheduled Tribes
– Article 340 — Commission to investigate conditions of backward classes (Mandal Commission was appointed under this)
– Criminal Tribes Act 1871 — Colonial law branding communities as criminal; repealed 1952
– Habitual Offenders Act — Replaced CTA in 1952; critics say it perpetuates similar profiling
Key Commissions on DNT Issues
- Renke Commission (2008) — Estimated DNT population at 10.74 crore; recommended welfare measures and separate enumeration
- Idate Commission — Identified nearly 1,200 DNT communities; documented their socio-economic conditions in detail
- National Commission for DNTs (2006) — Established to study conditions and recommend development measures
- DWBDNC (2019) — Development and Welfare Board for De-notified, Nomadic, and Semi-Nomadic Communities
Why a Separate Schedule Matters
Veteran linguist and activist Ganesh Narayan Devy has urged the Centre to grant DNTs their own Census entry, noting that the Census form has entries for identifying as SC and ST, but “there is nothing for DNTs. This would be a grave injustice.”
The case for a separate schedule rests on several arguments:
- Statistical visibility — Without accurate population data, no targeted policy is possible
- Historical injustice — The Criminal Tribes Act branded them as criminals for 81 years (1871-1952); post-independence rehabilitation has been minimal
- Welfare delivery failure — The SEED scheme has utilised only Rs 69.3 crore of Rs 200 crore allocated — a 34.6% utilisation rate
- Constitutional precedent — SCs (Art. 341) and STs (Art. 342) have separate schedules; DNTs deserve similar recognition
– Constitutional Law: Art. 342 (ST schedule) vs. absence of DNT schedule; Art. 14 and 15 (equality and non-discrimination)
– GK: Criminal Tribes Act 1871, Renke and Idate Commissions, Census 2027 caste enumeration
– Legal Reasoning: Can classification under SC/ST/OBC deliver justice to DNTs? The constitutional gap argument
– Social Justice: Colonial legacy of criminalisation, invisibility in official records, demand for constitutional recognition
D — Denotified in 1952 (Criminal Tribes Act repealed)
N — No separate constitutional schedule (unlike SC/ST under Art. 341/342)
T — Ten crore+ population (Renke Commission estimate: 10.74 crore)
Source: The Wire, Down To Earth, Insights on India — March 2026
Practice Quiz
Test your understanding with these 10 MCQs:
Practice Quiz — 10 CLAT-Style Questions
Click an option to reveal the answer and explanation.
